Advancing Scheduling Efficiency: Where Data and Technology Make an Impact

Student-centered schedules require more than data and analytics. Institutions need clear insight into enrollment trends, space utilization, and unmet course demand to help support stronger student outcomes. Yet many still rely on localized, reactive reporting rather than a coordinated data strategy. These approaches often require manual coordination, repeated data entry, and extensive communication across teams, which slows decision-making and constrains scheduling efficiency.

To better understand how institutions approach this challenge, AACRAO surveyed 340 colleges and universities in a study of class scheduling practices and technology. The findings show that while data plays a role in scheduling decisions, most institutions rely on reactive analytics rather than predictive or strategic models.

Current Approaches to Data Use in Class Scheduling

Across higher education, institutions vary in their use of data and analytics to inform course scheduling. According to the AACRAO study, 51% of surveyed institutions only leverage localized, reactive analytics and reporting efforts.

Another 32% report a modest, dedicated analytics strategy and only 5% employ a significant predictive analytics approach supported by dedicated staff and technology. Meanwhile, 13% indicate little to no use of data in the scheduling process.

It's not uncommon for institutions to run into barriers that make it difficult to leverage analytics. Lack of time leads the list, followed by limited staff expertise and insufficient tools. Many respondents also note resistance or limited buy-in, particularly from faculty, despite manual processes leading to additional work for staff members.  These constraints limit institutions’ ability to shift from reactive reporting to strategic, student-centered planning.

Institutional Investment in Scheduling Technology

The survey also highlights varied approaches to scheduling software integration. Currently, 42% of institutions actively use a class scheduling solution. Another 22% plan for future implementation and 37% report no present plan to acquire one.

Among institutions that use scheduling software, the vast majority report one or more benefits associated with its incorporation. These benefits frequently include improved operational efficiency, reduced time spent on manual coordination, and greater visibility into scheduling data. Only 6% indicate they have not realized measurable benefits to date.

These findings reflect an evolving technology landscape. While the presence of scheduling software is not universal, institutions that implement scheduling software generally report positive returns, reinforcing the role of technology as a foundational component of modern academic scheduling.

Adoption of Optimization Features in Scheduling Software

Optimization functions offer institutions a way to translate data into scheduling decisions. They incorporate data and business analytics to build efficient schedules that consider multiple aspects of the course scheduling process, such as when and where a class occurs. However, many apply these tools for limited purposes. Among respondents with scheduling software, 52% report use of the optimization function, 23% do not use it, and 25% lack access to the feature within their current system.

When institutions do use optimization features, the focus centers on space efficiency. In fact, 97% apply it to room assignments and space utilization. Fewer institutions extend optimization to broader scheduling decisions. All other uses, like reducing or eliminating conflicts in simultaneously scheduled required courses, fall below 50% of optimization applications.

Respondents cite challenges of broader use of optimization tools such as limited collaboration, lack of buy-in, system integration gaps, specialized classroom constraints, and faculty preferences that override optimization outputs. Institutions can mitigate these constraints through clear governance, integrated systems, and shared expectations for data-informed decision making. When institutions establish this structure, optimization can inform broader student-centric scheduling decisions rather than serve only as a space-management function.

Building the Foundation for Efficient, Student-Centered Scheduling

Student-centered scheduling requires more than isolated data points or standalone tools. It depends on coordinated strategy, shared accountability, and thoughtful use of technology. When institutions align systems, reduce manual processes, and strengthen data integration, they improve efficiency and establish a stronger foundation for an academic environment centered on student success.

‍